• Immigration policy should exist only to serve the British people
    • If it incidentally serves foreign people that’s fine, and of course it must else they would never immigrate here. But that should never be the reason we do it.
  • The obvious potential benefit of immigration are economic
    • This is reflected in the discourse which is largely economic
    • It would be rather odd if it weren’t the case. Would a serious case ever be made for immigration just to improve the variety of food on the high street?
  • Pretty much all studies show:
    • Low-wage workers (UK-born or migrant) have negative lifetime contributions
    • High-wage workers (UK-born or migrant) have positive lifetime contributions
  • Ergo, it’s a no brainer that our immigration policy should be focused solely on attracting high-wage workers, and rejecting low-wage.
    • Yes UK-born low-wage workers are also economically “undesirable” but that is a separate policy. Simply because we have home grown problems, doesn’t mean it’s OK to import more.
  • The scale of immigration should be controlled such that:
    • For permanent migrants, integration is practical
    • For temporary migrants, the risks of cultural conflict is minimized
  • Total finger in the wind, but I have seen the number of 5% being throw as the target percentage of our population that should be immigrants. This seems reasonable to me.
    • Today the number stands at close to 17% (2021 census)